Flickr set from the Exeter University Forum ahead of Wednesday
I think I will head there directly to get a good view. Several performances in the morning according to the Express and Echo including the Soul Choir.
I have found another couple of YouTube drupa videos to Tweet about.
It took about a week to render and load which is reasonable I think. Not exactly in time for the evening news the same day but then Youtube works on another level of time awareness.
When it was founded in 1946, the Arts Council could justify its activities in its own terms: it was there to widen access to the arts throughout the country, as well as to maintain and develop national arts institutions in the capital. Behind the latter policy lay a theory of artistic value that you could call patrician: art's purpose as ennobling, its realm the nation, its organisational form the institution, its repertoire the established canon and works aspiring to join it. In this the council was seeking to reverse a rising tide of populism (art's role as entertainment, its realm the marketplace, its form the business, its audience mass), a goal summed up in the founding chairman John Maynard Keynes's ringing declaration: "Death to Hollywood."
There has been no comment on this since Nov 2008. Many on the group seem to be from India and Brazil where ISO certification is growing. But I don't think the acceptance of quality as something to study has changed much in the UK though this may be discussed during #mtw3 online or at the meeting looking back on 30 years of the Management Learning MA at Lancaster.Learning with quality systems, is this obvious?I have just found this group so the topic may have come up previously.Is it obvious that learning is a large part of what happens through people in a quality system?I have tried to get interest in quality theory from people who study management learning. In the UK the people who know about learning tend to have a critical opinion about quality. Perhaps their experience in UK universities has not been pleasant. See "Making Quality Critical" by Wilkinson and Wilmott for example.So far there has not been much UK academic interest in relating quality theory to researching learning organisations. Peter Senge recognises the connections, see his mentions for Dr Deming in the update for The Fifth Discipline.My guess is that for most practitioners the links between learning and quality are obvious. Maybe academics just have to be organised in disciplines. Maybe it is just an issue in the UK.Comment welcome.
“Tweetjams”—live discussion forums via two-way Twitter postings—will herald and review Xerox’s activities at the show. Facilitated by WhatTheyThink’s Cary Sherburne, the chats will take place on Tuesday, April 24, at 2 p.m. EDT, and again on Tuesday, May 22, in the same time slot. Following @CSherburne or @XeroxProduction and including the hashtag#FuturePrint in Tweets is the ticket to joining the jams.
Reading What They Think on Adobe Creative Crowd