Cafes and Computers

This is a calmer version of a post to Medium yesterday. More about the Guardian later.

Comment Is Free style txt on why universities need more money ( unfair to undergraduates to charge them for staff training)

Includes this on current what's going on

Many universities have accepted that, in return for the higher fee, they need to up their game. Dusty storerooms are being converted into trendy cafes and shiny computer clusters, paint is being ordered by the tanker load, and chewing gum is being scraped off the underside of library desks.

My take is that this is more evidence of some academics, and/or print journalists , resent the move online and hope that everything will stay as it was except of course this will need more money.

Meanwhile in Exeter the independent student newspaper Exepose reports (18 Feb) that a 114 seat study space is planned for the second floor of Devonshire House at a cost of £300,000 . There will be some PCs, also wifi and power provision. Not a cafe though, so occasional trips to the ground floor.

What strikes me is how casual is the mention in a middle paragraph that "Blackwells, which is currently operating as a pop up service from the top floor of Devonshire House, will return to the Market Place at the end of April." Before the new Forum opened there was a sustained campaign in Exepose demanding that a bookshop be continued. This pressure seems to have vanished. The current "pop-up" has been there since the start of the current academic year.  Returning to the Market Place means a desk and a screen. I hear rumours that there may be another pop-up but I won't believe it till I read it in Exepose.

Although I welcome online developments I see no point in scrapping a bookshop that Blackwells believe to be viable. Flipped or blended, learning can still include printed books.

Also it seems to me that the decision not to have a bookshop in the Forum was a surface design sort of thing. The ambience is to compare with a mall or a departure lounge, more likely to have a shop for jewellery or smart phones. I don't think it was part of a considered view on what a flipped campus would be like.

The main story in the current Exepose is to ask if Exeter University is growing too fast. The editorial mentions 8.000 more students over ten year. Louis Dore reports that in October 2013 the University implemented 600 places in "approved" external accommodation. Exeter City Council has plans to cap multi-occupancy in certain districts.

What strikes me though is that the nature of the city centre is changing, especially close to Sidwell Street. Sites that used to be shops, factories or offices are now student accommodation. Will this continue indefinitely?

Two things seem possible. More online aspects to courses so that students are not in Exetet so often and/or  distributing the cafe / computer / study space so that travel to the campus is not needed. For example a film studies cafe in Sidwell Street would not need any new building, just some software to connect existing spaces.

Also this approach could result in a significant reduction in costs, making it possible to have more postgraduate courses, something that may interest the dean of arts and humanities at UCL.

 

 

 

Wild Show extended this Thursday

We have got an extra slot on Thursday, 2-4 as well as 10 -12.

Phonic FM listen online

So we can try out the cloud over coffee and then try to find it again on air.

Previously

From Hudl

From Zi8 in real time, no edits

So topics to include a) future of online editing

b) design science for organisations. We have covered design science for a music show in a studio that is assumed fixed. What to do about equipment and organisation to include other devices and locations?

 

Stills from Lightstream, help please on info and Creative Commons guidance

I have some photos and video from Lightstream in Fore Street on Saturday but not enough information.  Is Lightstream the general title for all three works or just for the one by Tal Rosner? What are the other titles and where did they come from?

Also is there explicit guidance on Creative Commons? I guess it is ok to photo / video / record sound and then edit / remix but am not sure. If there was an explicit statement it could help to generate more interest as well as new content. See the video interview from Isca Obscura aboutv three minutes in.

Also, what will happen with the talk originally intended for Spacex? Will there be an online archive at Soundcloud or somewhere? If Creative Commons it could be downloaded and used as part of something else.

ballet.jpg


tucker.jpg


pop.jpg

Wild Show this Thursday, six hours in cloud, FM studio, Cafe 55

More detail on this later. Following tests last week it turns out that a slot is available on Phonic FM between 2 and 4 this Thursday ,  the 20th . So we will have the usual Wild Show time between 10 and 12, then a break for coffee, then another two hours in studio.

Last week we got 20 seconds from Cafe 55 through a Hudl to YouTube. Also Chris loaded several iPhone clips from the Phonic Party. To YouTube from home a bit later, had to catch a bus. 

So we are getting closer to a mix of studio and cafe such as we would prefer.

Depends on mp3 and Creative Commons or else clear permission we can use sound clips from somewhere. Creative Commons is best as the audience can also mix and comment.

At the moment I'm not sure if Chris and JD can stay till 4 but there will be some continuity.

Topics may include

the Phonic Party, the Daft Monkeys and the very Dumb Bear. Are we sure they are relaxed about us mixing clips of their performance? do they really understand where this is going?

Lightstream from Fore Street. Titles of the three locations. If there is an online talk (Spacex cancelled because of storms etc) can it be recorded and reused? Broken up for comment?

what kit could we take to Cafe 55 or somewhere else?

more later



Prince Backs Content Marketing

It may not be a trend but the signs are that Prince has to some extent come to terms with the ideas around Content Marketing. There is a new video on YouTube with a full length piece of music , or at least a large section of live performance. It is hard to know where tunes stop or start without being there.

Previously there has been comment that the sales of the new single are below what was expected. Gigwise suggested that fans were too busy trying to get tickets to have time to download. This theory ignores the number of mobile phones available. I think it is more likely that few people know what the new single sounds like. There has only been a short extract released to YouTube. Online video now has the same role as radio. If new content cannot be discovered it is unlikely to sell.

There has yet to be any statement that Prince or Controversy Publishing have had a change of policy but the future events will be worth following.

My own particular interest is that I am back in good status with YouTube. So I can choose Creative Commons again. Not sure how this happened.