script for walk conversation
Thinking about the chat show as a format and how to adapt for YouTube.
Last year at the CAMRA Exeter Castle event was a start. this
convinces me that time is spread out. The conversation is not
communicated at all quickly, especially online. Also thinking about two walks during Experimentality. Timing could
influence this as there is not much of it. Bailrigg c Previously a script idea based on a walk on Lancaster campus. At the Experimentality conference I will talk about the Deming
learning cycle and "check / study" so quality will be part of the
discussion. So this means there are four stages or sets
- technology innovation proposal
- evaluated through quality ideas
- academic critique
- public space This would be InfoLab21 to start with, then the Management School or
George Fox both for something that accepted a quality perspective and
for critique. Then to Alexanderplatz / Learning Zone as public space.
If the Learning Zone is too loaded towards tech, then the Bowland deli
would work. Walk planned for Thursday about 7 Universities are moving out of the city to a campus so maybe art
galleries now have the role of critique. Technology offers digital
content but there is resistance to the values of crowds and arguments
about copyright etc. So in central Lancaster the walk could be from
the CityLab to the Storey. Not sure where the quality input is sited.
NICE may be part of the gallery scene but the bar may be public. Walk planned Wednesday about 6.30 This is helping me to understand the components of a talk / paper
presentation on Friday morning. So far I have done a text on the
supposed "dark side" of mode two knowledge. This is to try to get
academics past the doubts about quality as a topic. This would be
stage three on the walk but in the context is the first hurdle.
Slides about PDC/SA show the links between quality and learning,
relates to stage 2. Discussion is intended around issues in my blog
and looking at several web sites. this combines claims about then
potential of technology and evaluating what use the sites are to
social groups,.stages one and four on the walk. The walk could also frame many other issues around experimentality. Because of time pressures there may be other walks on the same routes
on another day. I am also thinking about a route in Exeter from the
Innovation Centre. The video version may not be too clear on the
actual location, especially if made up of short clips that the
audience has to put together.
Last year at the CAMRA Exeter Castle event was a start. this
convinces me that time is spread out. The conversation is not
communicated at all quickly, especially online. Also thinking about two walks during Experimentality. Timing could
influence this as there is not much of it. Bailrigg c Previously a script idea based on a walk on Lancaster campus. At the Experimentality conference I will talk about the Deming
learning cycle and "check / study" so quality will be part of the
discussion. So this means there are four stages or sets
- technology innovation proposal
- evaluated through quality ideas
- academic critique
- public space This would be InfoLab21 to start with, then the Management School or
George Fox both for something that accepted a quality perspective and
for critique. Then to Alexanderplatz / Learning Zone as public space.
If the Learning Zone is too loaded towards tech, then the Bowland deli
would work. Walk planned for Thursday about 7 Universities are moving out of the city to a campus so maybe art
galleries now have the role of critique. Technology offers digital
content but there is resistance to the values of crowds and arguments
about copyright etc. So in central Lancaster the walk could be from
the CityLab to the Storey. Not sure where the quality input is sited.
NICE may be part of the gallery scene but the bar may be public. Walk planned Wednesday about 6.30 This is helping me to understand the components of a talk / paper
presentation on Friday morning. So far I have done a text on the
supposed "dark side" of mode two knowledge. This is to try to get
academics past the doubts about quality as a topic. This would be
stage three on the walk but in the context is the first hurdle.
Slides about PDC/SA show the links between quality and learning,
relates to stage 2. Discussion is intended around issues in my blog
and looking at several web sites. this combines claims about then
potential of technology and evaluating what use the sites are to
social groups,.stages one and four on the walk. The walk could also frame many other issues around experimentality. Because of time pressures there may be other walks on the same routes
on another day. I am also thinking about a route in Exeter from the
Innovation Centre. The video version may not be too clear on the
actual location, especially if made up of short clips that the
audience has to put together.